Refugee Protection Crises and Transit Europe [electronic resource] : Immediate Responses, Selective Memory, and the Self-Serving Politics of Diversity / by Julija Sardelić.

За: Інтелектуальна відповідальність: Вид матеріалу: Текст Серія: IMISCOE Research SeriesПублікація: Cham : Springer Nature Switzerland : Imprint: Springer, 2025Видання: 1st ed. 2025Опис: XIII, 121 p. online resourceТип вмісту:
  • text
Тип засобу:
  • computer
Тип носія:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9783032012753
Тематика(и): Додаткові фізичні формати: Printed edition:: Немає назви; Printed edition:: Немає назви; Printed edition:: Немає назвиДесяткова класифікація Дьюї:
  • 304.8 23
Класифікація Бібліотеки Конгресу:
  • JV6001-9480
  • HB1951-2577
Електронне місцезнаходження та доступ:
Вміст:
Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. A Model response? -- Chapter 3. Constructing Temporary Protection -- Chapter 4. Hyper-Temporariness and Transit Migration -- Chapter 5. The Return of Limited, Conditional, and Selective Temporary Protection -- Chapter 6. Conclusion.
У: Springer Nature eBookЗведення: This open-access book presents a socio-legal analysis of immediate responses to large-scale refugee displacement in Europe after the 1951 Refugee Convention came into force, focusing on the countries to which refugees initially fled or through which they passed (namely Austria and, initially, Yugoslavia, followed by several of the former Yugoslav countries). First, it investigates the immediate responses to refugee movements following the suppression of the 1956 Hungarian Revolution by Soviet troops. Second, it examines the responses to individuals seeking asylum after being displaced during the post-Yugoslav wars of the 1990s. Third, it analyses the responses of the same countries to refugees fleeing Global South countries (predominantly Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan) in 2015 and 2016. Finally, it explores how these countries responded to the mass displacement of refugees from Ukraine. The book argues that these countries have positioned themselves as “transit” or temporary protection countries in order to avoid assuming long-term responsibility for a larger number of refugees. As a consequence, they granted various forms of temporary legal status to refugees that differed from the refugee status defined in the 1951 Refugee Convention. These legal statuses were hierarchical (in terms of the rights attached to them) and racialized, with the fewest rights granted to refugees from the Global South and other negatively racialized groups. The book traces the usage of self-serving politics of diversity and selective memory to legitimise why refugees could not be protected long-term in these countries, and also why there were such differences in treatment of refugees.
Тип одиниці:
Мітки з цієї бібліотеки: Немає міток з цієї бібліотеки для цієї назви. Ввійдіть, щоб додавати мітки.
Оцінки зірочками
    Середня оцінка: 0.0 (0 голос.)
Немає реальних примірників для цього запису

Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. A Model response? -- Chapter 3. Constructing Temporary Protection -- Chapter 4. Hyper-Temporariness and Transit Migration -- Chapter 5. The Return of Limited, Conditional, and Selective Temporary Protection -- Chapter 6. Conclusion.

Open Access

This open-access book presents a socio-legal analysis of immediate responses to large-scale refugee displacement in Europe after the 1951 Refugee Convention came into force, focusing on the countries to which refugees initially fled or through which they passed (namely Austria and, initially, Yugoslavia, followed by several of the former Yugoslav countries). First, it investigates the immediate responses to refugee movements following the suppression of the 1956 Hungarian Revolution by Soviet troops. Second, it examines the responses to individuals seeking asylum after being displaced during the post-Yugoslav wars of the 1990s. Third, it analyses the responses of the same countries to refugees fleeing Global South countries (predominantly Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan) in 2015 and 2016. Finally, it explores how these countries responded to the mass displacement of refugees from Ukraine. The book argues that these countries have positioned themselves as “transit” or temporary protection countries in order to avoid assuming long-term responsibility for a larger number of refugees. As a consequence, they granted various forms of temporary legal status to refugees that differed from the refugee status defined in the 1951 Refugee Convention. These legal statuses were hierarchical (in terms of the rights attached to them) and racialized, with the fewest rights granted to refugees from the Global South and other negatively racialized groups. The book traces the usage of self-serving politics of diversity and selective memory to legitimise why refugees could not be protected long-term in these countries, and also why there were such differences in treatment of refugees.

Accessibility summary: This PDF has been created in accordance with the PDF/UA-1 standard to enhance accessibility, including screen reader support, described non-text content (images, graphs), bookmarks for easy navigation, keyboard-friendly links and forms and searchable, selectable text. We recognize the importance of accessibility, and we welcome queries about accessibility for any of our products. If you have a question or an access need, please get in touch with us at accessibilitysupport@springernature.com. Please note that a more accessible version of this eBook is available as ePub.

No reading system accessibility options actively disabled

Publisher contact for further accessibility information: accessibilitysupport@springernature.com

Немає коментарів для цієї одиниці.

для можливості публікувати коментарі.