Prosthetic Body Parts in Nineteenth-Century Literature and Culture [electronic resource] / by Ryan Sweet.

За: Інтелектуальна відповідальність: Вид матеріалу: Текст Серія: Palgrave Studies in Nineteenth-Century Writing and CultureПублікація: Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022Видання: 1st ed. 2022Опис: XV, 283 p. 14 illus. online resourceТип вмісту:
  • text
Тип засобу:
  • computer
Тип носія:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9783030785895
Тематика(и): Додаткові фізичні формати: Printed edition:: Немає назви; Printed edition:: Немає назви; Printed edition:: Немає назвиДесяткова класифікація Дьюї:
  • 809.034 23
Класифікація Бібліотеки Конгресу:
  • PN760.5-769
Електронне місцезнаходження та доступ:
Вміст:
1. Introduction -- 2. Constructing and Complicating Physical Wholeness -- 3.“The infurnal thing”: Autonomy and Ability in Narratives of Disabling, Self-Acting, and Weaponised Prostheses -- 4. Mobilities: Physical and Social -- 5. “Losing a Leg to Gain a Wife”: Marriage, Gender, and the Prosthetic Body Part -- 6. Signs of Decline? Prostheses and the Ageing Subject -- 7. Conclusion.
У: Springer Nature eBookЗведення: This open access book investigates imaginaries of artificial limbs, eyes, hair, and teeth in British and American literary and cultural sources from the nineteenth and early twentieth century. Prosthetic Body Parts in Nineteenth-Century Literature and Culture shows how depictions of prostheses complicated the contemporary bodily status quo, which increasingly demanded an appearance of physical wholeness. Revealing how representations of the prostheticized body were inflected significantly by factors such as social class, gender, and age, Prosthetic Body Parts in Nineteenth-Century Literature and Culture argues that nineteenth-century prosthesis narratives, though presented in a predominantly ableist and sometimes disablist manner, challenged the dominance of physical completeness as they questioned the logic of prostheticization or presented non-normative subjects in threateningly powerful ways. Considering texts by authors including Charles Dickens, Edgar Allan Poe, and Arthur Conan Doyle alongside various cultural, medical, and commercial materials, this book provides an important reappraisal of historical attitudes to not only prostheses but also concepts of physical normalcy and difference.
Тип одиниці:
Мітки з цієї бібліотеки: Немає міток з цієї бібліотеки для цієї назви. Ввійдіть, щоб додавати мітки.
Оцінки зірочками
    Середня оцінка: 0.0 (0 голос.)
Немає реальних примірників для цього запису

1. Introduction -- 2. Constructing and Complicating Physical Wholeness -- 3.“The infurnal thing”: Autonomy and Ability in Narratives of Disabling, Self-Acting, and Weaponised Prostheses -- 4. Mobilities: Physical and Social -- 5. “Losing a Leg to Gain a Wife”: Marriage, Gender, and the Prosthetic Body Part -- 6. Signs of Decline? Prostheses and the Ageing Subject -- 7. Conclusion.

Open Access

This open access book investigates imaginaries of artificial limbs, eyes, hair, and teeth in British and American literary and cultural sources from the nineteenth and early twentieth century. Prosthetic Body Parts in Nineteenth-Century Literature and Culture shows how depictions of prostheses complicated the contemporary bodily status quo, which increasingly demanded an appearance of physical wholeness. Revealing how representations of the prostheticized body were inflected significantly by factors such as social class, gender, and age, Prosthetic Body Parts in Nineteenth-Century Literature and Culture argues that nineteenth-century prosthesis narratives, though presented in a predominantly ableist and sometimes disablist manner, challenged the dominance of physical completeness as they questioned the logic of prostheticization or presented non-normative subjects in threateningly powerful ways. Considering texts by authors including Charles Dickens, Edgar Allan Poe, and Arthur Conan Doyle alongside various cultural, medical, and commercial materials, this book provides an important reappraisal of historical attitudes to not only prostheses but also concepts of physical normalcy and difference.

Немає коментарів для цієї одиниці.

для можливості публікувати коментарі.