Austrian Imperial Censorship and the Bohemian Periodical Press, 1848–71 [electronic resource] : The Baneful Work of the Opposition Press is Fearsome / by Jeffrey T. Leigh.

За: Інтелектуальна відповідальність: Вид матеріалу: Текст Серія: Palgrave Studies in the History of the MediaПублікація: Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017Видання: 1st ed. 2017Опис: XV, 330 p. online resourceТип вмісту:
  • text
Тип засобу:
  • computer
Тип носія:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9783319558806
Тематика(и): Додаткові фізичні формати: Printed edition:: Немає назви; Printed edition:: Немає назви; Printed edition:: Немає назвиДесяткова класифікація Дьюї:
  • 943 23
Класифікація Бібліотеки Конгресу:
  • DAW1001-1051
Електронне місцезнаходження та доступ:
Вміст:
Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: The Revolution Begins: All Was Seemingly at Risk -- Chapter 3: The Revolutionary Year: The Defeat of the Revolution and the Victory of the Rule of Law -- Chapter 4: Press Policy and the Early Neoabsolutist State: The Melding of Absolutism and Liberalism -- Chapter 5: Press Policy under Mature Neoabsolutism: Threat, Legality, and the Continual Appearance of Opposition Journalism -- Chapter 6: Censorship in the Era of Limited Self-Government: Negotiating their Way through ‘the Wreckages of Unsuccessful Experiments’ in an Expanding Public Sphere -- Chapter 7: Tábory: The Sum of their Fears -- Chapter 8: Conclusions -- Index.
У: Springer eBooksЗведення: This book analyzes the conduct of press policy in Bohemia from the Revolutions of 1848 through the period of the Tábory, 1867-71. In the aftermath of the revolutions, the Habsburg state, far from constituting an historical relic, proved itself boldly innovative, inaugurating liberal reforms, most importantly the rule of law. While the reforms helped it to survive its immediate challenges, they nonetheless, quite paradoxically, created an environment in which the periodical press continued to advance perspectives emblematic of the revolution, even during the era of Neoabsolutism. This new legal environment fostered the rise of the bourgeois public sphere, as theorized by Jürgen Habermas, and the very political movements that would contribute to its demise, as signaled in the Tábory campaign of 1867-71. At the nexus of civil society and the state stood the provincial Habsburg officials responsible for public order and security. Their experience was one of endeavoring to balance the ideals of the rule of law imposed by the Imperial center and their own vital concerns regarding the survival of the Monarchy. This work, for the first time, concentrates on the role of these officials who determined what would—and would not—appear in print. .
Тип одиниці: ЕКнига Списки з цим бібзаписом: Springer Ebooks (till 2020 - Open Access)+(2017 Network Access)) | Springer Ebooks (2017 Network Access))
Мітки з цієї бібліотеки: Немає міток з цієї бібліотеки для цієї назви. Ввійдіть, щоб додавати мітки.
Оцінки зірочками
    Середня оцінка: 0.0 (0 голос.)
Немає реальних примірників для цього запису

Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: The Revolution Begins: All Was Seemingly at Risk -- Chapter 3: The Revolutionary Year: The Defeat of the Revolution and the Victory of the Rule of Law -- Chapter 4: Press Policy and the Early Neoabsolutist State: The Melding of Absolutism and Liberalism -- Chapter 5: Press Policy under Mature Neoabsolutism: Threat, Legality, and the Continual Appearance of Opposition Journalism -- Chapter 6: Censorship in the Era of Limited Self-Government: Negotiating their Way through ‘the Wreckages of Unsuccessful Experiments’ in an Expanding Public Sphere -- Chapter 7: Tábory: The Sum of their Fears -- Chapter 8: Conclusions -- Index.

This book analyzes the conduct of press policy in Bohemia from the Revolutions of 1848 through the period of the Tábory, 1867-71. In the aftermath of the revolutions, the Habsburg state, far from constituting an historical relic, proved itself boldly innovative, inaugurating liberal reforms, most importantly the rule of law. While the reforms helped it to survive its immediate challenges, they nonetheless, quite paradoxically, created an environment in which the periodical press continued to advance perspectives emblematic of the revolution, even during the era of Neoabsolutism. This new legal environment fostered the rise of the bourgeois public sphere, as theorized by Jürgen Habermas, and the very political movements that would contribute to its demise, as signaled in the Tábory campaign of 1867-71. At the nexus of civil society and the state stood the provincial Habsburg officials responsible for public order and security. Their experience was one of endeavoring to balance the ideals of the rule of law imposed by the Imperial center and their own vital concerns regarding the survival of the Monarchy. This work, for the first time, concentrates on the role of these officials who determined what would—and would not—appear in print. .

Available to subscribing member institutions only. Доступно лише організаціям членам підписки.

Online access from local network of NaUOA.

Online access with authorization at https://link.springer.com/

Онлайн-доступ з локальної мережі НаУОА.

Онлайн доступ з авторизацією на https://link.springer.com/

Немає коментарів для цієї одиниці.

для можливості публікувати коментарі.
Попереднє
Результати
Наступне
Закрити