Agent Causality [electronic resource] / by F. Vollmer.

За: Інтелектуальна відповідальність: Вид матеріалу: Текст Серія: Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science ; 283Публікація: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 1999Видання: 1st ed. 1999Опис: VII, 168 p. online resourceТип вмісту:
  • text
Тип засобу:
  • computer
Тип носія:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9789401592253
Тематика(и): Додаткові фізичні формати: Printed edition:: Немає назви; Printed edition:: Немає назви; Printed edition:: Немає назвиДесяткова класифікація Дьюї:
  • 128.2 23
Класифікація Бібліотеки Конгресу:
  • B53
Електронне місцезнаходження та доступ:
Вміст:
1. Problems with the Common Sense Theory of Action -- 2. Frankfurt’s Solution -- 3. Theories of Agent Causality -- 4. Persons -- 5. Reflective Consciousness -- 6. Empirical Research -- 7. The Epi-Phenomenalist Problem -- 8. Is The Self a Social Construction? -- 9. Darkness, Madness and Childhood -- 10. Overall Summary and Conclusions -- References -- Name Index.
У: Springer Nature eBookЗведення: We act for reasons. But, it is sometimes claimed, the mental states and events that make up reasons, are not sufficient conditions of actions. Reasons never make actions happen. We- as agents (persons, selves, subjects) - make our actions happen. Actions are done by us, not elicited by reasons. The present essay is an attempt to understand this concept of agent causality. Who -~ or what - is an agent ? And how - in virtue of what - does an agent do things, or refrain from doing them? The first chapter deals with problems in the theory of action that seem to require the assumption that actions are controlled by agents. Chapters two and three then review and discuss theories of agent cau­ sality. Chapters four and five make up the central parts of the essay in which my own solution is put forth, and chapter six presents some data that seem to support this view. Chapter seven discusses how the theory can be reconciled with neuro-physiological facts. And in the last two chapters the theory is confronted with conflicting viewpoints and phe­ nomena. Daniel Robinson and Richard Swinburne took time to read parts of the manuscript in draft form. Though they disagree with my main viewpoints on the nature of the self, their conunents were very helpful. I hereby thank them both.
Тип одиниці:
Мітки з цієї бібліотеки: Немає міток з цієї бібліотеки для цієї назви. Ввійдіть, щоб додавати мітки.
Оцінки зірочками
    Середня оцінка: 0.0 (0 голос.)
Немає реальних примірників для цього запису

1. Problems with the Common Sense Theory of Action -- 2. Frankfurt’s Solution -- 3. Theories of Agent Causality -- 4. Persons -- 5. Reflective Consciousness -- 6. Empirical Research -- 7. The Epi-Phenomenalist Problem -- 8. Is The Self a Social Construction? -- 9. Darkness, Madness and Childhood -- 10. Overall Summary and Conclusions -- References -- Name Index.

We act for reasons. But, it is sometimes claimed, the mental states and events that make up reasons, are not sufficient conditions of actions. Reasons never make actions happen. We- as agents (persons, selves, subjects) - make our actions happen. Actions are done by us, not elicited by reasons. The present essay is an attempt to understand this concept of agent causality. Who -~ or what - is an agent ? And how - in virtue of what - does an agent do things, or refrain from doing them? The first chapter deals with problems in the theory of action that seem to require the assumption that actions are controlled by agents. Chapters two and three then review and discuss theories of agent cau­ sality. Chapters four and five make up the central parts of the essay in which my own solution is put forth, and chapter six presents some data that seem to support this view. Chapter seven discusses how the theory can be reconciled with neuro-physiological facts. And in the last two chapters the theory is confronted with conflicting viewpoints and phe­ nomena. Daniel Robinson and Richard Swinburne took time to read parts of the manuscript in draft form. Though they disagree with my main viewpoints on the nature of the self, their conunents were very helpful. I hereby thank them both.

Немає коментарів для цієї одиниці.

для можливості публікувати коментарі.