Supreme Courts in Transition in China and the West [electronic resource] : Adjudication at the Service of Public Goals / edited by Cornelis Hendrik (Remco) van Rhee, Yulin Fu.

Інтелектуальна відповідальність: Вид матеріалу: Текст Серія: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ; 59Публікація: Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, 2017Видання: 1st ed. 2017Опис: VI, 245 p. 11 illus., 9 illus. in color. online resourceТип вмісту:
  • text
Тип засобу:
  • computer
Тип носія:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9783319523446
Тематика(и): Додаткові фізичні формати: Printed edition:: Немає назви; Printed edition:: Немає назви; Printed edition:: Немає назвиДесяткова класифікація Дьюї:
  • 340.9 23
  • 340.2 23
Класифікація Бібліотеки Конгресу:
  • K7000-7720.22
  • K7073-7078
Електронне місцезнаходження та доступ:
Вміст:
Chapter 1. Introduction (Van Rhee/Fu) -- Chapter 2. The Supreme People’s Court of Mainland China (Fu) -- Chapter 3. The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (Andrews) -- Chapter 4. Supreme Courts in the Nordic Countries (Oyrehagen Sunde) -- Chapter 5.The Supreme Cassation Court of the Netherlands (Verkerk/Van Rhe) -- Chapter 6.The Supreme Cassation Court of Spain (De Benito) -- Chapter 7. Supreme Courts in the German Speaking Countries (Domej) -- Chapter 8. The Supreme Cassation Court of Chile (Bravo Hurtado) -- Chapter 9. The Cour de cassation of France (Ferrand) -- Chapter 10. Supreme Courts in Croatia and Slovenia (Uzelac and Galič) -- Chapter 11. The Corte di cassazione in Italy (Silvestri).
У: Springer eBooksЗведення: This edited volume looks at supreme courts in China and the West. It examines the differences and similarities between the Supreme People’s Court of Mainland China and those that follow Western models. It also offers a comparative study of a selection of supreme courts in Europe and Latin America. The contributors argue that the Supreme Courts should give guidance to the development of the law and provide legal unity. For China, the Chinese author argues, that therefore there should be more emphasis on the procedure for reopening cases. The chapters on Western-style supreme courts argue that there should be adequate access filters; the procedure of reopening cases is considered to be problematic from the perspective of the finality of the administration of justice. In addition, the authors discuss measures that allow supreme courts in both regions to deal with their existing caseload, to reduce this caseload, and to avoid divergences in the case law of the supreme court. This volume offers ideas that will help supreme courts in both the East and the West to remove unmanageable caseloads. As a result, these courts will be better able to assist in the interpretation and clarification of the law, to provide for legal unity, and to give guidance to the development of the law. .
Тип одиниці: ЕКнига Списки з цим бібзаписом: Springer Ebooks (till 2020 - Open Access)+(2017 Network Access)) | Springer Ebooks (2017 Network Access))
Мітки з цієї бібліотеки: Немає міток з цієї бібліотеки для цієї назви. Ввійдіть, щоб додавати мітки.
Оцінки зірочками
    Середня оцінка: 0.0 (0 голос.)
Немає реальних примірників для цього запису

Chapter 1. Introduction (Van Rhee/Fu) -- Chapter 2. The Supreme People’s Court of Mainland China (Fu) -- Chapter 3. The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (Andrews) -- Chapter 4. Supreme Courts in the Nordic Countries (Oyrehagen Sunde) -- Chapter 5.The Supreme Cassation Court of the Netherlands (Verkerk/Van Rhe) -- Chapter 6.The Supreme Cassation Court of Spain (De Benito) -- Chapter 7. Supreme Courts in the German Speaking Countries (Domej) -- Chapter 8. The Supreme Cassation Court of Chile (Bravo Hurtado) -- Chapter 9. The Cour de cassation of France (Ferrand) -- Chapter 10. Supreme Courts in Croatia and Slovenia (Uzelac and Galič) -- Chapter 11. The Corte di cassazione in Italy (Silvestri).

This edited volume looks at supreme courts in China and the West. It examines the differences and similarities between the Supreme People’s Court of Mainland China and those that follow Western models. It also offers a comparative study of a selection of supreme courts in Europe and Latin America. The contributors argue that the Supreme Courts should give guidance to the development of the law and provide legal unity. For China, the Chinese author argues, that therefore there should be more emphasis on the procedure for reopening cases. The chapters on Western-style supreme courts argue that there should be adequate access filters; the procedure of reopening cases is considered to be problematic from the perspective of the finality of the administration of justice. In addition, the authors discuss measures that allow supreme courts in both regions to deal with their existing caseload, to reduce this caseload, and to avoid divergences in the case law of the supreme court. This volume offers ideas that will help supreme courts in both the East and the West to remove unmanageable caseloads. As a result, these courts will be better able to assist in the interpretation and clarification of the law, to provide for legal unity, and to give guidance to the development of the law. .

Available to subscribing member institutions only. Доступно лише організаціям членам підписки.

Online access from local network of NaUOA.

Online access with authorization at https://link.springer.com/

Онлайн-доступ з локальної мережі НаУОА.

Онлайн доступ з авторизацією на https://link.springer.com/

Немає коментарів для цієї одиниці.

для можливості публікувати коментарі.